Featured Stories

4 responses to “Top 10 Reasons 401k Plan Sponsors Fear ETFs Not Ready For Primetime”

  1. Chuck Epstein

    ETFs are overdue for a larger role in 401(k)s, but since they do not engage in revenue sharing with the plan sponsor, plus they have lower expenses, they do not get top shelf space. A lower expense product would create a new expense benchmark against mutual funds. ETFs also have the elements to make a better target-date fund product, and if packaged correctly, should garner a much larger market share in the 401(k) space.

  2. Jan Sackley, CFE

    Chris,
    I simply want to thank you for promoting discussion of the ETF topic and the related implications for sponsors and participants, and also for individual investors. I believe we will see a changing tide with respect to how service providers are paid, leading to a renewed overhaul of investment choices that may or may not include ETFs.

    Jan Sackley, CFE
    Fiduciary Foresight, LLC
    Twitter@FidFore
    fiduciaryforesight.com

  3. Darwin Abrahamson

    Chris,
    10 top reasons why 401k plan sponsors fear ETFs is incorrect the titled the tile should read 10 top reasons why advisors fear ETFs.

    Paul Wiesbruch is correct if ETFs are offered it is “very important for the fiduciary to know how ETF orders are being executed. “ Catalano is incorrect mutual funds have more of a fiduciary problem than ETF because of high management fees, revenue sharing, 12(b)(1) fees, internal trading cost and multiple share classes.To answer Mr. Heck statement “why bother with ETFs,” the answer is that index mutual funds have higher fees than ETFs based on the same index and the ETFs do not have internal trading cost like index funds.
    The average cost for the ETFs in the NSRP 401(k) Plan which I am the plan sponsor of is 18bps.

    Participants in 401(k) plans are not going to have any different investment behavior whether their plan has EFTs or mutual funds. Participants have zero chance of being educated on investment education. The 401(k) fiduciaries should not maintain the responsibility or liability of selecting investment options when they can hire an ERISA §3(38) investment manager.  A 3(38) investment manager is a prudent expert that has full fiduciary discretion to select the investment options and design and manage model portfolios for the participants. This also removes the participants from the investment process which they will never be experts at. I hired a 3(38) for the NSRP 401(k)Plan.

    Darwin Abrahamson, CEO
    Invest n Retire, LLC

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to receive occasional updates from Fiduciary News, please complete the form below. We will never share your information with any other party, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
* indicates required

Are you doing everything you can to reduce your fiduciary liability?

Fiduciary News provides essential information, blunt commentary and practical examples for ERISA/401k fiduciaries, individual trustees and professional fiduciaries. Our chief contributor is Chris Carosa.

Follow us on Twitter and join our LinkedIn group. You can also subscribe to our RSS feed.
Subscribe to our RSS feed

Fiduciary News is sponsored by…

IFC

Recommended Reading

Visitor Trackingdata recoveryData Recovery SoftwareData Recoveryforexbest forex broker