Like lemmings to the sea, retirement savers default to a controversial product.
Due Diligence
If the product is so “pro-consumer” why are consumers not pro-product?
Despite evidence of its uselessness, it’s been a long goodbye for volatility. Will this bomb unsuspecting plan sponsors?
Fiduciary Duty is more than just about fees.
Do you think the nature of those interests have changed since the plan was originally created? Has plan design changed accordingly?
What can 401k plan sponsors do to help prevent employees from getting hurt by the coming bond crash.
It’s clear behavioral finance and economics studies will continue to define the leading edge of 401k design and implementation.
Exposed as misleading as early as 1999, should 401k plan sponsors continue to risk increasing their fiduciary liability by condoning their use?
If you give 401k investors enough rope, are you responsible if they hang themselves?
This content is not available to your membership level. It is available to: Basic
You may register with FiduciaryNews.com for free to become a Basic Member. You may also upgrade to benefit from premium content available only to Professional and Preferred Members.
You may be seeing this because you did not Login. If you have logged in and are still seeing this, you will need to check your member level is able to access this content.
Bonds and bond funds alike suffer from rising interest rates, but bonds are protected in ways bond funds are not. Does the typical 401k investor know that?
