401k participant understanding is no longer optional. Fiduciaries may do everything right—yet still face risk when participants make uninformed decisions.
Posts From Christopher Carosa, CTFA
Fiduciaries can follow every step of a prudent process and still end up with outcomes they did not anticipate. That’s not how fiduciary risk is supposed to work. Or at least, not how it used to work.
Saver’s Match fiduciary risk is arriving faster than the rules meant to govern it. Plans must decide how to respond before the system is fully built.
Once the regulatory gaps are acknowledged, the issue quickly shifts from theory to action. Plan sponsors are not just waiting for guidance. They are being forced to decide whether to engage with the Saver’s Match at all.
Private equity is knocking on the 401k door again as a designated investment alternative. Does expanded access mean expanded fiduciary risk?
Private equity inside a daily-valued, participant-directed plan introduces structural tension. Illiquid assets must coexist with participant liquidity expectations. Valuations must be estimated where markets do not exist. And governance must bridge that gap without introducing bias or delay.
The 401k fiduciary rule is gone again. The risk is not. In this regulatory limbo, plan sponsors face more exposure, not less.
Viewing this content requires a Basic (Free) Membership or better. You are not currently logged in. If you have an
ERISA meaningful benchmark debate heads to Supreme Court just as private equity pushes deeper into 401k plans. Are committees ready?
Private equity investments raise a second layer of fiduciary difficulty because they are not simply harder to compare. They are also harder to value, harder to redeem, and harder to explain to participants who may assume daily-priced plan options operate under familiar public-market rules.
